↓ Skip to main content

Towards personalized integrated dementia care: a qualitative study into the implementation of different models of case management

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards personalized integrated dementia care: a qualitative study into the implementation of different models of case management
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-14-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa D Van Mierlo, Franka JM Meiland, Hein PJ Van Hout, Rose-Marie Dröes

Abstract

The aim of this process evaluation was to provide insight into facilitators and barriers to the delivery of community-based personalized dementia care of two different case management models, i.e. the linkage model and the combined intensive case management/joint agency model. These two emerging dementia care models differ considerably in the way they are organized and implemented. Insight into facilitators and barriers in the implementation of different models is needed to create future guidelines for successful implementation of case management in other regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Librarian 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Computer Science 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,027,062
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,104
of 3,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,931
of 228,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.