You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Poor glycemic control in younger women attending Malaysian public primary care clinics: findings from adults diabetes control and management registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Family Practice, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ai Theng Cheong, Ping Yein Lee, Shariff-Ghazali Sazlina, Bujang Mohamad Adam, Boon How Chew, Ismail Mastura, Haniff Jamaiyah, Syed-Abdul-Rahman Syed Alwi, Taher Sri Wahyu, Mat-Nasir Nafiza |
| Abstract |
Women of reproductive age are a group of particular concern as diabetes may affect their pregnancy outcome as well as long-term morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the clinical profiles and glycemic control of reproductive and non-reproductive age women with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in primary care settings, and to determine the associated factors of poor glycemic control in the reproductive age group women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 43 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,374,472
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Family Practice
#1,527
of 1,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,693
of 306,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Family Practice
#40
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.