↓ Skip to main content

The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The electronic self report assessment and intervention for cancer: promoting patient verbal reporting of symptom and quality of life issues in a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Cancer, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-513
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donna L Berry, Fangxin Hong, Barbara Halpenny, Anne Partridge, Erica Fox, Jesse R Fann, Seth Wolpin, William B Lober, Nigel Bush, Upendra Parvathaneni, Dagmar Amtmann, Rosemary Ford

Abstract

The electronic self report assessment - cancer (ESRA-C), has been shown to reduce symptom distress during cancer therapy The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate aspects of how the ESRA-C intervention may have resulted in lower symptom distress (SD).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 178 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 51 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 18%
Psychology 22 12%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Unspecified 7 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 60 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,302,478
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,106
of 8,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,617
of 226,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#60
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,277 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.