You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
XALIA: rationale and design of a non-interventional study of rivaroxaban compared with standard therapy for initial and long-term anticoagulation in deep vein thrombosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Thrombosis Journal, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-9560-12-16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Walter Ageno, Lorenzo G Mantovani, Sylvia Haas, Reinhold Kreutz, Verena Haupt, Jonas Schneider, Alexander GG Turpie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 12 | 22% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 12 | 22% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 63% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,394,109
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#90
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,649
of 244,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.