RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @MarinaMedvin: An academic journal article that argued that “colonial rule often accelerated economic development” was removed by a jour…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
This sounds like the scene in the movie “42” where the Pee Wee Reese character complained to Branch Rickey about getting a death threat, and Rickey showed him the hundreds of death threats that Jackie Robinson got.
RT @MarinaMedvin: An academic journal article that argued that “colonial rule often accelerated economic development” was removed by a jour…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
If you’re on the side of the people who do this; you’re a baddie.
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @MarinaMedvin: An academic journal article that argued that “colonial rule often accelerated economic development” was removed by a jour…
RT @MarinaMedvin: An academic journal article that argued that “colonial rule often accelerated economic development” was removed by a jour…
RT @MarinaMedvin: An academic journal article that argued that “colonial rule often accelerated economic development” was removed by a jour…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
An academic journal article that argued that “colonial rule often accelerated economic development” was removed by a journal after leftist extremists threatened to hurt the journal editor.
We're now China, USSR and North Korea
Streisand effect in action! https://t.co/3MsOfyl0cZ
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
Follow the science, except when data contradicts dogma. Colonialism was good, actually.
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @stillgray: You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force…
You're no longer allowed to study whether colonialism had any positives because people will send you death threats and force the journal to remove the paper.
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @CliveSG: Incredibly misleading statement from the publisher, and gullible to fall for it @davidfrum. The article failed the peer review…
Incredibly misleading statement from the publisher, and gullible to fall for it @davidfrum. The article failed the peer review process and was published anyway as clickbait by an editor who had financial interests in the journal. 15 members of the board re
RT @NAChristakis: How pathetic. Making death threats to editors & authors because you do not like an essay published in an academic journal…
RT @MahaRafiAtal: Might be worth checking the facts here @davidfrum. The threats to the author were abhorrent, but the article was also wit…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @AfricaBusPol: Not surprised that Gilley seeks yet another dose of victimhood. Surprised that @davidfrum does not do his homework. Old…
Not surprised that Gilley seeks yet another dose of victimhood. Surprised that @davidfrum does not do his homework. Old non-story from 2017 recounted a million times. Look here: https://t.co/borZW1jrSh
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @MahaRafiAtal: Might be worth checking the facts here @davidfrum. The threats to the author were abhorrent, but the article was also wit…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @tlecaque: I'm sorry, @davidfrum are you kidding with this? Where have you been and why did you not bother doing any research on why thi…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @MahaRafiAtal: Might be worth checking the facts here @davidfrum. The threats to the author were abhorrent, but the article was also wit…
This is why violent threats are the most idiotic reaction to papers like the one @davidfrum is referring to: they make the author look like a sort of martyr or freedom fighter (paradoxical enough for someone who dismissed the fight for freedom of colonized
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @MahaRafiAtal: Might be worth checking the facts here @davidfrum. The threats to the author were abhorrent, but the article was also wit…
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @AudieKlotz: Apparently @davidfrum went looking for a discredited article defending colonialism—why? Then he ends up defending the discr…
RT @NisansaDdS: Well, the article in question (link below) was unsurprising. So are the death threats on the poor editor. https://t.co/YT…
RT @BrandAid_World: Important white dude knows none of the facts+misrepresents the TWQ saga to fit his weary agenda. Probably will have ‘im…
Well, the article in question (link below) was unsurprising. So are the death threats on the poor editor. https://t.co/YTuwn6IwQZ
RT @AudieKlotz: Apparently @davidfrum went looking for a discredited article defending colonialism—why? Then he ends up defending the discr…
RT @AudieKlotz: Apparently @davidfrum went looking for a discredited article defending colonialism—why? Then he ends up defending the discr…
sinistro
RT @BrandAid_World: Important white dude knows none of the facts+misrepresents the TWQ saga to fit his weary agenda. Probably will have ‘im…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
Apparently @davidfrum went looking for a discredited article defending colonialism—why? Then he ends up defending the discredited author of that article, based on the media storm that the discredited author generated.🧐 He’s been played and doesn’t even rea
RT @tlecaque: I'm sorry, @davidfrum are you kidding with this? Where have you been and why did you not bother doing any research on why thi…
I'm sorry, @davidfrum are you kidding with this? Where have you been and why did you not bother doing any research on why this article was rightfully withdrawn (tl;dr it should never have been published in the first place)
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
RT @HistoryNed: The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers r…
The withdrawal notice for Gilley's notorious article is disingenuous is that it ignores: a) three separate peer reviewers rejected the article, b) 15 members of the journal's editorial board resigned in protest of it being published in spite of this reject
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
RT @KimAtiWagner: What an absolutely ignorant and disingenuous take by @davidfrum...
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
What an absolutely ignorant and disingenuous take by @davidfrum...
RT @davidfrum: I sought this morning an article in an academic journal. Instead of the article, I found this statement: that the article ha…
Important white dude knows none of the facts+misrepresents the TWQ saga to fit his weary agenda. Probably will have ‘impact’ 😡 What do we say to @davidfrum Board? @AfricaBusPol @UrbanDavidSimon @vijayprashad @ilankapoor @KatieWillisGeog @mm1124
Being an editor in academia is stable, they said. https://t.co/gEb2M9e1iY https://t.co/F2ij0G4hD0