↓ Skip to main content

Depth gradients in food‐web processes linking habitats in large lakes: Lake Superior as an exemplar ecosystem

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Biology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depth gradients in food‐web processes linking habitats in large lakes: Lake Superior as an exemplar ecosystem
Published in
Freshwater Biology, July 2014
DOI 10.1111/fwb.12415
Authors

Michael E. Sierszen, Thomas R. Hrabik, Jason D. Stockwell, Anne M. Cotter, Joel C. Hoffman, Daniel L. Yule

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 24%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Other 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 34 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 24 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,490,321
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Biology
#1,683
of 2,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,847
of 231,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Biology
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.