↓ Skip to main content

Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Pollution, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 13,750)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
78 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
227 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
1046 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States
Published in
Environmental Pollution, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Nowak, Satoshi Hirabayashi, Allison Bodine, Eric Greenfield

Abstract

Trees remove air pollution by the interception of particulate matter on plant surfaces and the absorption of gaseous pollutants through the leaf stomata. However, the magnitude and value of the effects of trees and forests on air quality and human health across the United States remains unknown. Computer simulations with local environmental data reveal that trees and forests in the conterminous United States removed 17.4 million tonnes (t) of air pollution in 2010 (range: 9.0-23.2 million t), with human health effects valued at 6.8 billion U.S. dollars (range: $1.5-13.0 billion). This pollution removal equated to an average air quality improvement of less than one percent. Most of the pollution removal occurred in rural areas, while most of the health impacts and values were within urban areas. Health impacts included the avoidance of more than 850 incidences of human mortality and 670,000 incidences of acute respiratory symptoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 227 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,046 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 1023 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 176 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 14%
Researcher 133 13%
Student > Bachelor 111 11%
Other 46 4%
Other 143 14%
Unknown 288 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 264 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 139 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 53 5%
Engineering 51 5%
Social Sciences 34 3%
Other 159 15%
Unknown 346 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 867. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,156
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Pollution
#6
of 13,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117
of 241,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Pollution
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.