↓ Skip to main content

The prospective relationship between sedentary time and cardiometabolic health in adults at increased cardiometabolic risk – the Hoorn Prevention Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prospective relationship between sedentary time and cardiometabolic health in adults at increased cardiometabolic risk – the Hoorn Prevention Study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12966-014-0090-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teatske M Altenburg, Jeroen Lakerveld, Sandra D Bot, Giel Nijpels, Mai JM Chinapaw

Abstract

Sedentary time has been identified as an important and independent risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) in adults. However, to date most studies have focused on TV time, few also included other sedentary behaviours such as computer use and reading, and most studies had a cross-sectional design. We aimed to examine the prospective relationship between time spent on sedentary behaviours in different domains with individual and clustered cardiometabolic risk in adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Sports and Recreations 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Psychology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 42 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,424,591
of 24,501,737 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,479
of 2,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,154
of 231,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#24
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,501,737 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.