↓ Skip to main content

Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010357.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharon R Lewis, Amanda Nicholson, Andrew F Smith, Phil Alderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 20%
Social Sciences 13 8%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 32 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#582,313
of 14,336,677 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,701
of 10,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,963
of 188,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,336,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.