You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Positive Effects of a Healthy Snack (Fruit) Versus an Unhealthy Snack (Chocolate/Crisps) on Subjective Reports of Mental and Physical Health: A Preliminary Intervention Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2014.00010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew Paul Smith, Rosannagh Rogers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 3 | 27% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brunei Darussalam | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
Researcher | 9 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 16% |
Unknown | 48 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
Psychology | 20 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 12% |
Unknown | 56 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#199,893
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#121
of 7,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,548
of 242,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them