↓ Skip to main content

A microscopic evaluation of railway timetable robustness and critical points

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A microscopic evaluation of railway timetable robustness and critical points
Published in
Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, September 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jrtpm.2017.08.005
Authors

Emma Solinen, Gemma Nicholson, Anders Peterson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 75%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 75%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,000,385
of 9,183,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management
#7
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,819
of 251,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,183,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them