↓ Skip to main content

Prognosticating in patients with advanced cancer—observational study comparing the accuracy of clinicians’ and patients’ estimates of survival

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognosticating in patients with advanced cancer—observational study comparing the accuracy of clinicians’ and patients’ estimates of survival
Published in
Annals of Oncology, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mds341
Pubmed ID
Authors

B Gwilliam, V Keeley, C Todd, C Roberts, M Gittins, L Kelly, S Barclay, P Stone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Japan 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 14 20%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 17%
Computer Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,811,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#925
of 7,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,798
of 190,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#16
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.