↓ Skip to main content

Erratum: A novel mechanism for mechanosensory-based rheotaxis in larval zebrafish

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum: A novel mechanism for mechanosensory-based rheotaxis in larval zebrafish
Published in
Nature, September 2017
DOI 10.1038/nature23895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pablo Oteiza, Iris Odstrcil, George Lauder, Ruben Portugues, Florian Engert

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nature23014.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2017.
All research outputs
#10,201,795
of 12,771,346 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#64,710
of 66,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,064
of 265,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#764
of 773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,771,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.