↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis of the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic total coronary occlusions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Meta-analysis of the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic total coronary occlusions
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-9-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruogu Li, Shuansuo Yang, Lei Tang, Yiqing Yang, Hui Chen, Shaofeng Guan, Wenzheng Han, Hua Liu, Jinjie Dai, Qian Gan, Weiyi Fang, Xinkai Qu

Abstract

Coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) is the last stage of coronary artery atherosclerosis. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a therapeutic procedure used to recanalize vessels with total occlusion. However, successful recanalization of CTO is still not optimal, and the key influence factors are still uncertainty. Therefore, a scientific evaluation on the effective of PCI for CTO treatment is necessary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Librarian 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Design 2 7%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#16,745,862
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#447
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,244
of 226,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.