↓ Skip to main content

Physical training for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical training for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002768.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judy M Bradley, Fidelma Moran, Bradley J, Moran F, Bradley, Judy M, Moran, Fidelma

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Sports and Recreations 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,229,188
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,660
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,941
of 201,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.