↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for post‐stroke fatigue

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for post‐stroke fatigue
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007030.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth McGeough, Alex Pollock, Lorraine N Smith, Martin Dennis, Michael Sharpe, Susan Lewis, Gillian E Mead, McGeough E, Pollock A, Smith LN, Dennis M, Sharpe M, Lewis S, Mead GE, McGeough, Elizabeth, Pollock, Alex, Smith, Lorraine N, Dennis, Martin, Sharpe, Michael, Lewis, Susan, Mead, Gillian E

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 44%
Psychology 9 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Unspecified 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Other 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#7,562,066
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,825
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,032
of 201,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.