↓ Skip to main content

Sleep deprivation leads to a loss of functional connectivity in frontal brain regions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,269)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
32 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep deprivation leads to a loss of functional connectivity in frontal brain regions
Published in
BMC Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2202-15-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilse M Verweij, Nico Romeijn, Dirk JA Smit, Giovanni Piantoni, Eus JW Van Someren, Ysbrand D van der Werf

Abstract

The restorative effect of sleep on waking brain activity remains poorly understood. Previous studies have compared overall neural network characteristics after normal sleep and sleep deprivation. To study whether sleep and sleep deprivation might differentially affect subsequent connectivity characteristics in different brain regions, we performed a within-subject study of resting state brain activity using the graph theory framework adapted for the individual electrode level.In balanced order, we obtained high-density resting state electroencephalography (EEG) in 8 healthy participants, during a day following normal sleep and during a day following total sleep deprivation. We computed topographical maps of graph theoretical parameters describing local clustering and path length characteristics from functional connectivity matrices, based on synchronization likelihood, in five different frequency bands. A non-parametric permutation analysis with cluster correction for multiple comparisons was applied to assess significance of topographical changes in clustering coefficient and path length.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Unknown 230 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 16%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 63 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 18%
Neuroscience 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 8%
Engineering 13 6%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 78 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,157,625
of 24,126,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#23
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,783
of 233,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,126,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.