You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Characteristics affecting oral anticoagulant therapy choice among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-310 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Azza AbuDagga, Judith J Stephenson, An-Chen Fu, Winghan Jacqueline Kwong, Hiangkiat Tan, William S Weintraub |
Abstract |
Dabigatran is one of the three newer oral anticoagulants (OACs) recently approved in the United States for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. The objective of this study was to identify patient, healthcare provider, and health plan factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use among NVAF patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
Canada | 2 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Slovenia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Researcher | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 54% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#6,973,546
of 24,294,767 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,366
of 8,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,447
of 208,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#42
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,294,767 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.