@LeafRief @anneristamende Schöne Ausrede, bei dieser Thematik besteht ein Konsens und alle Wissenschaftler sind sich bezüglich des Flächenverbrauchs bei tierischer/vegetarischer/veganer Ernährungsweise einig. https://t.co/0CuGMMqIjI https://t.co/GDm9TTrzRs
@TomsWorld01 @MaureenStroud @TheDisproof @FatEmperor While grazing cows (that DON'T graze on deforested lands!) can support biodiversity and soil health, it's still an inefficient way to produce calories & protein. And if everyone wants grass-fed beef,
RT @HandsOffMyMeat: American eggs have a better carbon footprint than rice. https://t.co/zrk7PIq8Fx… #climatechange #eatlessforearth #glob…
RT @HandsOffMyMeat: Poultry, eggs, & dairy are efficient, with a similar protein/feed input as staple plant crops wheat, rice, & potatoes h…
Poultry, eggs, & dairy are efficient, with a similar protein/feed input as staple plant crops wheat, rice, & potatoes https://t.co/4dM3O3sQmt #climatechange #eatlessforearth #handsoffmymeat #eggs #ClimateScam #Dairy
American eggs have a better carbon footprint than rice. https://t.co/zrk7PIq8Fx… #climatechange #eatlessforearth #globalwarming #handsoffmymeat #ClimateActionNow #eggs #earth https://t.co/qhRykWU2rb
@NordicLight10 @EvaToller @rockspindeln @pgl031974 Självklart så är ju närodlat bäst, men det går att odla växter också. Nötköttsproduktion kräver 160 gånger mer mark än potatis, vete och ris och det släpper ut 11 gånger mer växthusgaser. https://t.co/fUc
@Tencowalibongo @Maltreting @KorolukM @slwstr Nie tak wyglądają te liczby. https://t.co/QoN3pPy5zT
@MissDistAlgo @labronic_mike @fgavazzoni Mado’ il casino che hai in testa! Povero, come fai a funzionare? Allora: la carne *è* per benestanti. Il mangime si coltiva — fai attenzione — *sottraendo* campi alla produzione commestibile. Allevare vacche partico
@salma_poet அறிவின் அடிப்படைக்கு போகலாம். உலகத்துலையே எது தெரியுமா காற்று மற்றும் நில மாசின் முக்கிய காரணம் ? இறைச்சி அதிலும் மாட்டிறைச்சி தான். எங்க, இப்ப சொல்லுங்க புலால் உண்பது தவறு. https://t.co/ErKdtw8si6 https://t.co/Is9GrTLa1p https://t.co/OVHtV
கவனிக்கவும்: இவை யாவும் ஆர் எஸ் எஸ் எழுதினது அல்ல. https://t.co/UBfzYX9Ix5 https://t.co/ErKdtw8si6 https://t.co/Is9GrTLa1p https://t.co/OVHtV2pWsk https://t.co/BcbKPzr8BM https://t.co/uBLPfYRRTK https://t.co/xyl9XMZ6fE
@tadarahim7 கவனிக்கவும்:அதெல்லாம் ஆர் எஸ் எஸ் எழுதினது அல்ல. https://t.co/UBfzYX9Ix5 https://t.co/ErKdtw8si6 https://t.co/Is9GrTLa1p https://t.co/BcbKPzr8BM https://t.co/8gcuVXUh3O
@czynarow https://t.co/wlLHmFFol2 про использование ресурсов и парниковые газы связанные с производством разной еды (спойлер:говядина в разы больше парниковых газов производит, чем птичье мясо/молочка)
@cabot_phillips Man, you are quite the conspiracy 🥜 . Could it be that Gates instead is right that beef has a high C02 impact? Please stop with the nonsense. https://t.co/8EMRVu3BFx
RT @oukabread: @MrSollozzo Feels like the “industrialization” of chicken also provides a relatively efficient source of protein… aren’t we…
"Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States" https://t.co/o8rrd40JKa
RT @oukabread: @MrSollozzo Feels like the “industrialization” of chicken also provides a relatively efficient source of protein… aren’t we…
@MrSollozzo Feels like the “industrialization” of chicken also provides a relatively efficient source of protein… aren’t we worried a return mindset could only drive up the resources needed to produce this stuff at scales needed to feed everyone? https://t
@turbotechdog @piggy_jags More relevant to the UK (& most other high-income countries) are the far bigger impacts of animal-based foods, & in particular red meat and dairy. This study, for instance, compared those impacts in the US https://t.co/OC
Dr @Swamy39 Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States🍁🍁 @jagdishshetty https://t.co/oQPmAavv05
#plantbasedfood has many positive advantages. When compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases https://t.co/90wu8VXI4g
@IngoHeinscher @BendlerBlogger @robert_mey Mal von Ihrer ad personam zielenden Art zu argumentieren? Nun, nehmen wir eine Studie, die im renommierten PNAS erschien und damit wissenschaftlichen Standards entsprechen dürfte https://t.co/0B9qDDw36P
@little_wow https://t.co/2Whbo4oEQw Cows are so different from pigs and chicken, my sense is that farming practices are secondary.
@Niall44985967 @alandoh90773863 @GrayanOne @JolyonMaugham This study says’s beef is “one order of magnitude” more - which is not really disputed maybe you have better info? https://t.co/PMe91TifnF
RT @HenrikHindby: "Det står klart, at politiske beslutninger, der reducerer forbruget af animalske fødevarer, vil mindske fødevareproduktio…
"Det står klart, at politiske beslutninger, der reducerer forbruget af animalske fødevarer, vil mindske fødevareproduktionens miljøomkostninger markant," skriver Eshel et al. (2014). https://t.co/iHdB8HErwJ
@steak_umm @gagebigmanlunk @Im__Reading @andrewcirko Hmmmm, yes, science, and all that... https://t.co/6TmdK3gYrs
Excuse me if I take with a grain of salt anything said by a company that deliberately ignores the science that shows how its products are THEE WORST for the environment. Y'all love to ignore the inconvenient parts, but go on and play these dumb games... ht
RT @leosdadd: https://t.co/Sls5IxC3tL The study, if anyone is curious
RT @HenrikHindby: @lars_kunstmann @SlothKristian Konsensus om mindre kød, mere grønt er tydelig: 1) https://t.co/zTBRrP28yi 2) https://t.co…
@lars_kunstmann @SlothKristian Konsensus om mindre kød, mere grønt er tydelig: 1) https://t.co/zTBRrP28yi 2) https://t.co/WcLzGBLQzq 3) https://t.co/iHdB8HErwJ 4) https://t.co/uOO90FQExh 5) https://t.co/2wrQPG3H7C https://t.co/aFKAOqrT76
@theanuragkts @MeenaDasNarayan @theskindoctor13 @ThePlacardGuy @deespeak One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an environmentalist and eats beef is a FRAUD https://t.co/ez92rHWMuc h
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
RT @RahulMulik13: Great info
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
@Adharma_dharma @MrRao_RB @DrlathaC @abhivyakti1_ @ImRo45 One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an environmentalist and eats beef is a FRAUD https://t.co/ez92rHWMuc https://t.co/MNX
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
@drharshvardhan your views on this article sir.. foreign portal pe chhapaa hain toh Sach hi hoga na?
#Bitcoin #
If you have a woke friend who eats beef or any kind of red meat or even normal meat, and teaches you lessons on environmentalism. Just know that he/she/it is being logically and pure hypocrite. Leave personal or religious opinions about diet aside. But at
Even if you grow cow for milk, they are going to consume same amount of resources per animal, whether you grow for beef, milk. Article written by someone whose major utilisation of cows is in form of meat. As for most activists, they don't want animals t
@deespeak One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an environmentalist and eats beef is a FRAUD https://t.co/ez92rHWMuc https://t.co/MNX9LgbeHt
@shyamlucky One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an environmentalist and eats beef is a FRAUD https://t.co/ez92rHWMuc https://t.co/MNX9LgbeHt
@ImRo45 One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an environmentalist and eats beef is a FRAUD https://t.co/ez92rHWMuc https://t.co/MNX9LgbeHt
インド人「牛肉ステーキ1枚は植物性クッキー40キロより環境破壊。宗教の理由じゃなくエコロジスト名乗ってるのに牛肉食うから突っ込んでるんだよ」 これほんと真実。 「頭良くてかわいいイルカさん殺すジャップは皆殺し!」との差よ。
Inconvenient truth for the hypocrite environmentalists!!! 🤣😂🤣
The Guardian has also become Sanghi mouthpiece? Shame! @ppbajpai, @sardesairajdeep @BDUTT for secularism's sake DO SOMETHING.🙄😡
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
Great info
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
RT @BharadwajSpeaks: One plate of beef causes more environmental damage than 40 Kgs of Diwali crackers. Any celebrity who poses as an envi…
@reptileighanne I got this recreation from the Conservation Science textbook by Kareiva and Marvier. But the original is from this paper (Figure 2): https://t.co/g2G3hWicWk
This is what eating animals really costs. https://t.co/X18mZrYEwJ
@ShihYangRage @maktness @martaph01 non è questione di essere d'accordo o no https://t.co/TXK30N6klv https://t.co/Ypg4440BEY sfamiamo 70 miliardi di animali terrestri, attualmente potremmo produrre cibo per 10 milioni di persone
5. Try cutting down on meat consumption - especially beef. #meatlessmondays Animal based food production contributes to about one-fifth of global greenhouse gas emissions. Cited here @PNASNews https://t.co/VIT9ROduwy
RT @EAllen0417: Environmentalists who aren't vegan are increasingly ridiculous. Presidential candidates who aren't vegan are equally so, es…
RT @EAllen0417: Environmentalists who aren't vegan are increasingly ridiculous. Presidential candidates who aren't vegan are equally so, es…
Environmentalists who aren't vegan are increasingly ridiculous. Presidential candidates who aren't vegan are equally so, especially if they are repeatedly seen in public consuming red meat. This has gotten absurd. https://t.co/r9r7mkKMba https://t.co/VR0
@SmithAgConrad Is your definition of "excellent" in relation to it's "excellent" destruction of the environment? https://t.co/VDbtREVz3L https://t.co/MiTZ98llPL
@djpmac007 Here is a breakdown of the study on environmental impact: https://t.co/8Z2Bwfato2 It shows a 89% reduction in carbon as compared to beef. Here is a 2014 study about Beef vs other Meats: https://t.co/1g8E6XVAiC It puts GHG from Beef at 6-7x th
Here is a cool thing I learned from my primary article #prescottchem https://t.co/N2SHBgHLHk
Especially beef, Eschel et al, 2014: "Data imperfections notwithstanding, the key conclusion—that beef production demands about 1 order of magnitude more resources than alternative livestock categories—is robust under existing uncertainties." https://t.co/
@NicholasDCarter May I suggest using a peer-reviewed source for the footprints of different kinds of food? Gidon Eshel has a great paper in @PNASNews that estimates land, water, and carbon footprints of different foods https://t.co/elPLPe7BO0 https://t.co/
@JimCameron @Schwarzenegger @ProfTimNoakes @guyzo @garytaubes @EliudKipchoge @NBCNews @DeanOrnishMD An important true statement is that environmental cost of animal food is much greater than plant food. This is science-based, beautifully shown by Ron Milo:
Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States -- https://t.co/N2SHBgHLHk #prescottchem
@BrandonPMize @scrowder Yeah, try actually going through the sources. Here is the basis for that ludicrous claim: https://t.co/sBqmfmjuCo Have you actually read this? Its methodology is extraordinarily flawed. Evidently crop rotation is just not a thin
@TruthSerumMed "Livestock production impacts air and water quality, ocean health, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on regional to global scales and it is the largest use of land globally." Excerpt from: https://t.co/dlgVR2PjJt
@tesne https://t.co/hdSP1lcGMA https://t.co/AyZCaiYFAC etc etc etc... En general todos los estudios, desde hace muchos años apuntan a que el impacto ambiental de la ganadería es gigantesco
Don't know the source of this guy's data from 2010, but this scientific article concludes that exact opposite https://t.co/cufNJDRb4s. Also consider that Meat and dairy industry are #1 source of methane and uses more water than any other human activity htt
@russnelson @JoshBaer5 @ZachGWise @rangermonk1 @volcommie That's one kind of grass-fed, yes. The kind most people get is not that kind. At any rate, livestock is the method of food production that is most damaging environmentally, taste notwithstanding:
@BenSullins @GerberKawasaki Do the analysis, but many scientists have. While I agree it will be difficult to get people to change behavior, the science is there https://t.co/BN7vVzQFOv
@jwmares See this paper as a representative of a very robust literature on the environmental costs of meat eating. https://t.co/H2vE2fzLZq
@RebeccaJYA I saw the statistics in the documentary Before The Flood! The study was done by Gidon Eshel and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Scientists. https://t.co/k2BUtuMwRn
@JayyCu @Lo_Ruuun here’s a bunch of links to articles on this subject. they are usually listed under the threads that vegans compile. https://t.co/6uXB270bM4
@cl1ckb41t @StealthOrchard @ChrisGPackham More on land use for soya: https://t.co/ylOd5t5MoI Land to feed one person for one year: Vegan: 1/6th acre Vegetarian: 3x as much as a vegan Meat Eater: 18x as much as a vegan 1.5 acres can produce 37,000 pounds
@emilyhholden @Zhirji28 @BuzzFeedNews @Trucost The way I think about it is that our choices continue after we walk through the door. Beef definitely causes substantial GHG emissions. Accounting for that (and emissions associated with milk in coffee) is far
@mmdelbar @GHGGuru Thanks for attending Michael. Here is one of literally over 1,000 peer reviewed studies that validates my point - - anyone who cares about the future of the planet will give up beef! https://t.co/gWntSCgcm9
@jnos01 @serious_inquiry @LatinaWisdom @motherjuniper @race_jones Here’s a good start: https://t.co/4UqhuirXic
Impacto #ambiental de diferentes tipos de #alimentos de origen animal y recursos utilizados para su producción. https://t.co/vjD37OIR1x https://t.co/Z1iqkPQxzT
"...aikakauslehdessä julkaistun tutkimuksen mukaan naudanliha vaatii 28x enemmän maata ja 11x enemmän vettä kuin sianliha tai kana. Viljoihin verrattuna vaikutukset ovat vielä suuremmat." lihansyönnin vähentäminen on paras mahdollinen #ympäristöteko http
RT @RainaleneT: #OMG 😱 Did you know an individual consumes 200 pounds of meat each year?🐮🐷 Increasing our greenhouse gas emissions. Lets l…
RT @RainaleneT: #OMG 😱 Did you know an individual consumes 200 pounds of meat each year?🐮🐷 Increasing our greenhouse gas emissions. Lets l…
#OMG 😱 Did you know an individual consumes 200 pounds of meat each year?🐮🐷 Increasing our greenhouse gas emissions. Lets limit our meat intake and #makeamericasmartagain yeah ? #theregoesmydiet @csuebhsc300 #hsc300hw1feb14 https://t.co/CCd3Hspeaf https://
Climate impact of beef vs dairy, poultry, pork, eggs. Old news but here‘s the data. I was in particular curious about beef vs dairy, came across the chart while researching that question. Source: https://t.co/grRn5NijxH https://t.co/biXhXFSZtn