The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006842.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morrison L, Agnew J, Morrison, Lisa, Agnew, Jennifer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,121,524
of 26,544,284 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,470
of 13,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,149
of 240,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.