You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006842.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morrison L, Agnew J, Morrison, Lisa, Agnew, Jennifer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 10 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Scientists | 4 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 117 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Researcher | 15 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Psychology | 6 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 11% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,641,570
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,072
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,405
of 240,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#135
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.