↓ Skip to main content

Next-generation sequencing library preparation: simultaneous fragmentation and tagging using in vitro transposition

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
6 patents
weibo
1 weibo user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Next-generation sequencing library preparation: simultaneous fragmentation and tagging using in vitro transposition
Published in
Nature Methods, November 2009
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.f.272
Authors

Fraz Syed, Haiying Grunenwald, Nicholas Caruccio

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 147 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 25%
Researcher 37 24%
Student > Master 24 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Student > Bachelor 6 4%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,287,701
of 24,717,692 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,323
of 5,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,670
of 101,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.