↓ Skip to main content

Two cases who survived acute, potentially fatal caffeine overdose

Overview of attention for article published in NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 176)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two cases who survived acute, potentially fatal caffeine overdose
Published in
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 2009
DOI 10.3893/jjaam.20.941
Authors

Takayuki Sato, Takao Nakagawa, Masayoshi Nishina, Hiroyasu Suga, Haruki Takahashi, Yoshizumi Deguchi, Takashi Kobayashi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,532,241
of 19,073,355 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#9
of 176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,434
of 203,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,073,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them