↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: Social Media Responses to the March 2014 Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club on Targeted Temperature Management∗

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club: Social Media Responses to the March 2014 Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club on Targeted Temperature Management∗
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, August 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.06.003
Pubmed ID
25059776
Authors

Brent Thoma, Daniel Rolston, Michelle Lin

Abstract

In March 2014, Annals of Emergency Medicine continued a successful collaboration with an academic Web site, Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM), to host another Global Emergency Medicine Journal Club session featuring the 2013 New England Journal of Medicine article "Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C (91.4°F) Versus 36°C (96.8°F) After Cardiac Arrest" by Nielsen et al. This online journal club used Twitter conversations, a live videocast with the authors, and detailed discussions on the ALiEM Web site's comment section. This summary article details the community discussion, shared insights, and analytic data generated using this novel, multiplatform approach.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Denmark 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Unknown 56 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Librarian 5 8%
Other 22 36%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 46%
Computer Science 7 11%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 9 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,708,288
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#2,797
of 6,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,271
of 229,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#39
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.