↓ Skip to main content

Human papillomavirus-related psychosocial impact of patients with genital warts in China: a hospital-based cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human papillomavirus-related psychosocial impact of patients with genital warts in China: a hospital-based cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-739
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shu-Zhen Qi, Shao-Ming Wang, Ju-Fang Shi, Qian-Qiu Wang, Xiang-Sheng Chen, Li-Jun Sun, An Liu, Nanci Zhang, Ning Jiang, Priya Siva, Xiu-Lian Xu, You-Lin Qiao

Abstract

Genital warts (GW) are the most common sexually transmitted infections. To date, few studies using a human papillomavirus (HPV)-specific questionnaire have focused on the impact of quality of life (QoL) among patients with GW in developing countries. The origins of GW related psychosocial burdens and variations between genders were poorly characterized as well.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Psychology 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,782,907
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,874
of 14,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,726
of 228,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#212
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.