You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Making use of equity sensitive QALYs: a case study on identifying the worse off across diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-12-16 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frode Lindemark, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Kjell Arne Johansson |
| Abstract |
Resource allocation decisions currently lack standard quantitative methods for incorporating concerns about the worse off when analysing the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 32% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,536,007
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#303
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,931
of 239,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.