You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fatal Attraction? Intraguild Facilitation and Suppression among Predators.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The American Naturalist, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1086/693996 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly J Sivy, Casey B Pozzanghera, James B Grace, Laura R Prugh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 23% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 82 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,410,691
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The American Naturalist
#1,401
of 4,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,354
of 327,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Naturalist
#36
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.