↓ Skip to main content

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009700.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miriam Keane, Douglas Coster, Mohammed Ziaei, Keryn Williams

Abstract

Keratoconus is an ectatic (weakening) disease of the cornea, which is the clear surface at the front of the eye. Approximately 10% to 15% of patients diagnosed with keratoconus require corneal transplantation. This may be full-thickness (penetrating) or partial-thickness (lamellar).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 24 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,323,540
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,815
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,575
of 192,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.