↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for strabismic amblyopia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for strabismic amblyopia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006461.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Taylor, Sue Elliott

Abstract

Amblyopia is reduced visual acuity in one or both eyes in the absence of any demonstrable abnormality of the visual pathway. It is not immediately resolved by the correction of refractive error. Strabismus develops in approximately 5% to 8% of the general population. The aim of treatment for amblyopia is to obtain the best possible level of vision in the amblyopic eye. Different treatment options were examined within the review.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Other 9 9%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Psychology 6 6%
Engineering 5 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 13 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,684,904
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,836
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,659
of 192,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.