↓ Skip to main content

Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Elizabeth R Anderson, Simon Gates, Rosalie M Grivell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 187 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Postgraduate 27 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 25 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 33 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,810,425
of 16,547,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,530
of 11,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,199
of 196,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#113
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,547,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.