↓ Skip to main content

Catheter associated urinary tract infections

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 X users
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
382 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
937 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Catheter associated urinary tract infections
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2994-3-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay E Nicolle

Abstract

Urinary tract infection attributed to the use of an indwelling urinary catheter is one of the most common infections acquired by patients in health care facilities. As biofilm ultimately develops on all of these devices, the major determinant for development of bacteriuria is duration of catheterization. While the proportion of bacteriuric subjects who develop symptomatic infection is low, the high frequency of use of indwelling urinary catheters means there is a substantial burden attributable to these infections. Catheter-acquired urinary infection is the source for about 20% of episodes of health-care acquired bacteremia in acute care facilities, and over 50% in long term care facilities. The most important interventions to prevent bacteriuria and infection are to limit indwelling catheter use and, when catheter use is necessary, to discontinue the catheter as soon as clinically feasible. Infection control programs in health care facilities must implement and monitor strategies to limit catheter-acquired urinary infection, including surveillance of catheter use, appropriateness of catheter indications, and complications. Ultimately, prevention of these infections will require technical advances in catheter materials which prevent biofilm formation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 937 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 928 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 172 18%
Student > Master 158 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 10%
Researcher 73 8%
Student > Postgraduate 57 6%
Other 129 14%
Unknown 256 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 79 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 72 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 6%
Other 189 20%
Unknown 279 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,105,446
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#93
of 1,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,695
of 240,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.