↓ Skip to main content

Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia. New therapies in fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biology and therapy of fibromyalgia. New therapies in fibromyalgia
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, June 2006
DOI 10.1186/ar1971
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lesley M Arnold

Abstract

Fibromyalgia is a chronic, musculoskeletal pain condition that predominately affects women. Although fibromyalgia is common and associated with substantial morbidity and disability, there are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments. However, progress has been made in identifying pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for fibromyalgia. Recent pharmacological treatment studies have focused on selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, which enhance serotonin and norepinephrine neurotransmission in the descending pain pathways and lack many of the adverse side effects associated with tricyclic medications. Promising results have also been reported for medications that bind to the alpha2delta subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels, resulting in decreased calcium influx at nerve terminals and subsequent reduction in the release of several neurotransmitters thought to play a role in pain processing. There is also evidence to support exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, education, and social support in the management of fibromyalgia. It is likely that many patients would benefit from combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, but more study is needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 213 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Other 60 27%
Unknown 50 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Psychology 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1,710
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,560
of 86,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.