↓ Skip to main content

Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Safety in Surgery, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 116)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-9493-8-31
Pubmed ID
Abstract

Patients undergoing emergency surgery have a high risk for surgical complications and death. The Clavien-Dindo classification has been developed and validated in elective general surgical patients, but has not been validated in emergency surgical patients. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications in emergency surgical patients and to study preoperative factors for risk stratification that should be included into a database of surgical complications.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Iceland 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 20%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 70%
Psychology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Energy 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,712,826
of 4,507,778 outputs
Outputs from Patient Safety in Surgery
#36
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,111
of 109,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Safety in Surgery
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 61st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.