↓ Skip to main content

Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008190.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Chinuck, Jane Dewar, David R Baldwin, Elizabeth Hendron

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 214 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 20%
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 34 16%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 15%
Psychology 17 8%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 53 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,324,440
of 14,765,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,824
of 11,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,193
of 191,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,765,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.