↓ Skip to main content

Changes in costs and effects after the implementation of disease management programs in the Netherlands: variability and determinants

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in costs and effects after the implementation of disease management programs in the Netherlands: variability and determinants
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-12-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Apostolos Tsiachristas, Jane Cramm, Anna P Nieboer, Maureen PMH Rutten-van Mölken

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the changes in costs and outcomes after the implementation of various disease management programs (DMPs), to identify their potential determinants, and to compare the costs and outcomes of different DMPs.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 21%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,269,555
of 15,442,255 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#219
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,285
of 194,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,442,255 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them