You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The sensitivity of gamma-index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-9-167 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jung-in Kim, So-Yeon Park, Hak Jae Kim, Jin Ho Kim, Sung-Joon Ye, Jong Min Park |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 39 | 45% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#1,040
of 2,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,177
of 228,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#36
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,050 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.