↓ Skip to main content

Effect of miscarriage history on maternal-infant bonding during the first year postpartum in the First Baby Study: a longitudinal cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of miscarriage history on maternal-infant bonding during the first year postpartum in the First Baby Study: a longitudinal cohort study
Published in
BMC Women's Health, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-14-83
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cara Bicking Kinsey, Kesha Baptiste-Roberts, Junjia Zhu, Kristen H Kjerulff

Abstract

Miscarriage, the unexpected loss of pregnancy before 20 weeks gestation, may have a negative effect on a mother's perception of herself as a capable woman and on her emotional health when she is pregnant again subsequent to the miscarriage. As such, a mother with a history of miscarriage may be at greater risk for difficulties navigating the process of becoming a mother and achieving positive maternal-infant bonding with an infant born subsequent to the loss. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of miscarriage history on maternal-infant bonding after the birth of a healthy infant to test the hypothesis that women with a history of miscarriage have decreased maternal-infant bonding compared to women without a history of miscarriage.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 3 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2014.
All research outputs
#3,062,378
of 4,507,509 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#264
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,321
of 109,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.