You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High versus low dose of initial thyroid hormone replacement for congenital hypothyroidism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006972.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sze May Ng, Dhullipala Anand, Alan M Weindling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,629,662
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,741
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,910
of 185,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#45
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.