↓ Skip to main content

Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
52 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000213.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna M Wardlaw, Veronica Murray, Eivind Berge, Gregory J del Zoppo

Abstract

The majority of strokes are due to blockage of an artery in the brain by a blood clot. Prompt treatment with thrombolytic drugs can restore blood flow before major brain damage has occurred and could improve recovery after stroke. Thrombolytic drugs, however, can also cause serious bleeding in the brain, which can be fatal. One drug, recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), is licensed for use in highly selected patients within three hours of stroke.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 2%
Unknown 46 88%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unknown 46 88%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#167,125
of 13,616,677 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#376
of 10,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,687
of 192,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,616,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,679 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.