↓ Skip to main content

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in this source, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006053.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diener, Markus K, Fitzmaurice, Christina, Schwarzer, Guido, Seiler, Christoph M, Antes, Gerd, Knaebel, Hanns-Peter, Büchler, Markus W

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Postgraduate 7 15%
Researcher 7 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 83%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 5 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2013.
All research outputs
#868,195
of 3,795,664 outputs
Outputs from this source
#3,482
of 6,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,748
of 94,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#57
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,795,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.