↓ Skip to main content

Surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004835.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J Sladden, Charles Balch, David A Barzilai, Daniel Berg, Anatoli Freiman, Teenah Handiside, Sally Hollis, Marko B Lens, John F Thompson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 177 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Master 16 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 63 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 66 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2022.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,437
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,279
of 110,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.