↓ Skip to main content

Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural and community-level interventions for increasing condom use to prevent the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003363.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralfh Moreno, Herfina Y Nababan, Erika Ota, Windy MV Wariki, Satoshi Ezoe, Stuart Gilmour, Kenji Shibuya

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 268 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 81 30%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 14%
Unspecified 29 11%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 31%
Social Sciences 53 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 16%
Unspecified 44 16%
Psychology 15 6%
Other 31 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,156,335
of 13,849,339 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,415
of 10,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,378
of 192,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,849,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.