You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cardiovascular effects of monoterpenes: a review
Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia, August 2011
Márcio R. V. Santos, Flávia V. Moreira, Byanka P. Fraga, Damião P. de Souza, Leonardo R. Bonjardim, Lucindo J. Quintans-Junior
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||4||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||31||20%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||21||13%|
|Student > Master||19||12%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||35||22%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||21||13%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||16||10%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||4||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2017.
All research outputs
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 119,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.