↓ Skip to main content

Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding
Published in
Genome Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13073-014-0058-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne B Haga, Rachel Mills, Kathryn I Pollak, Catherine Rehder, Adam H Buchanan, Isaac M Lipkus, Jennifer H Crow, Michael Datto

Abstract

With the emergence of electronic medical records and patient portals, patients are increasingly able to access their health records, including laboratory reports. However, laboratory reports are usually written for clinicians rather than patients, who may not understand much of the information in the report. While several professional guidelines define the content of test reports, there are no guidelines to inform the development of a patient-friendly laboratory report. In this Opinion, we consider patient barriers to comprehension of lab results and suggest several options to reformat the lab report to promote understanding of test results and their significance to patient care, and to reduce patient anxiety and confusion. In particular, patients' health literacy, genetic literacy, e-health literacy and risk perception may influence their overall understanding of lab results and affect patient care. We propose four options to reformat lab reports: 1) inclusion of an interpretive summary section, 2) a summary letter to accompany the lab report, 3) development of a patient user guide to be provided with the report, and 4) a completely revised patient-friendly report. The complexity of genetic and genomic test reports poses a major challenge to patient understanding that warrants the development of a report more appropriate for patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 18%
Researcher 28 18%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 46 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,392,299
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#302
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,726
of 229,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.