You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002969.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rita Ranmal, Megan Prictor, J Tim Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 495 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 486 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 14% |
| Researcher | 49 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 104 | 21% |
| Unknown | 121 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 22% |
| Psychology | 78 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 11% |
| Unknown | 143 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,795,801
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,318
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,286
of 102,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.