↓ Skip to main content

Redwoods, restoration, and implications for carbon budgets

Overview of attention for article published in Geomorphology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redwoods, restoration, and implications for carbon budgets
Published in
Geomorphology, April 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.012
Authors

Mary Ann Madej

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Malaysia 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Unspecified 3 9%
Engineering 3 9%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2011.
All research outputs
#3,528,783
of 12,299,050 outputs
Outputs from Geomorphology
#330
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,278
of 200,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geomorphology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,299,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.