↓ Skip to main content

Redwoods, restoration, and implications for carbon budgets

Overview of attention for article published in Geomorphology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redwoods, restoration, and implications for carbon budgets
Published in
Geomorphology, April 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.012
Authors

Mary Ann Madej

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Engineering 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Geomorphology
#813
of 2,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,291
of 103,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geomorphology
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.