You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research into practice: prompt diagnosis of cancer in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x681205 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Greg Rubin, Fiona Walter, Jon Emery, Richard Neal, Willie Hamilton, Jane Wardle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,198,374
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,081
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,998
of 228,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#41
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.