You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhaled anticholinergics and short‐acting beta<sub>2</sub>‐agonists versus short‐acting beta2‐agonists alone for children with acute asthma in hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010283.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin Vézina, Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan, Francine M Ducharme |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 85 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 14% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 92 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,680,200
of 25,810,956 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,952
of 13,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,084
of 240,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,810,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.