You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005025.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kamal R Mahtani, Carl J Heneghan, Paul P Glasziou, Rafael Perera |
| Abstract |
Current methods of improving medication adherence for health problems are mostly complex, labour-intensive, and not reliably effective. Medication 'reminder packaging' which incorporates a date or time for a medication to be taken in the packaging, can act as a reminder system to improve adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 402 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 92 | 22% |
| Researcher | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 68 | 16% |
| Unknown | 74 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 147 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 32 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 7% |
| Psychology | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,381,244
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,160
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,441
of 125,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.