↓ Skip to main content

Site-independent confirmation of subject selection for CNS trials: ‘dual’ review using audio-digital recordings

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Site-independent confirmation of subject selection for CNS trials: ‘dual’ review using audio-digital recordings
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12991-014-0021-3
Authors

Steven D Targum, J Cara Pendergrass

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 21%
Student > Postgraduate 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,233,547
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#422
of 509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,246
of 229,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them