↓ Skip to main content

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008930.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire J Ireland, Timothy M Chapman, Suneeth F Mathew, G Peter Herbison, Mathew Zacharias

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 19%
Unspecified 29 15%
Other 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 11%
Other 59 31%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 52%
Unspecified 39 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 12%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,831,412
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,178
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,602
of 192,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.