↓ Skip to main content

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during the postoperative period for prevention of postoperative morbidity and mortality following major abdominal surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008930.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire J Ireland, Timothy M Chapman, Suneeth F Mathew, G Peter Herbison, Mathew Zacharias

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 279 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 17%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Other 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 27 10%
Other 58 20%
Unknown 52 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 15%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 4 1%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 70 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,413,254
of 14,993,348 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,121
of 11,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,823
of 194,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,993,348 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.